don't conservatives want to go back
to the good old days? As I recall,
there
were much more stringent
restrictions
on firearms back then (not to
mention
the highly taxed wealthy)
We are kind not for the benefit of
others (a happy side effect), but
so
we can feel the grace of that
kindness.
It's not about religious canons --
it's about the cannon fodder
to feed the empire
Liberty to do what one knows one
ought, freedom to follow one's
conscience, despite the power of
the crowd, the fear of the powerful
Why not take it all on faith
(as we do)
What do we gain raising up
energy against beliefs?
Even the clearly impossible,
from time to time
becomes. Accept or not.
We each are but one aspect.
I heard it suggested that people
who believe in the freedom implied
by the 2nd Amendment see those
awful side effects of innocents
killed
as unfortunate necessities to
maintain,
to secure their freedom, their
right.
I say this is another excellent,
vital
reason to arrange for, give ongoing
voice to open conversation (not
debate
or argument or name-calling free
fight,
but reasoned conversation) so all
stakeholders (all of us affected)
get to
explain, even plea for, each and
all of
our rights, our freedom -- like the
freedom
to each as best we can live and
fulfill
our lives.
Damned humanity -- destroying
everything, everyone
in pursuit of a tragically stupid
consensual fantasy.
3/26-4/1/23
No comments:
Post a Comment